OUTCOME-BASED AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT FOR GRADUATE ISLAMIC RELIGIOUS EDUCATION AT UNZAH

Authors

  • Siti Sholehah Universitas Islam Zainul Hasan Genggong Probolinggo Author
  • Ainur Rofiq Sofa Universitas Islam Zainul Hasan Genggong Probolinggo Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4163-0055
  • Muhammad Ichsan Universitas Hafshawaty Zainul Hasan Author

Keywords:

Outcome-Based Education, Authentic Assessment, Islamic Religious Education, Constructive Alignment, Graduate Learning

Abstract

This article formulates an outcome-based authentic assessment model for the Master’s Program in Islamic Religious Education (S2 PAI) at Universitas Islam Zainul Hasan Genggong. Graduate-level PAI learning requires evidence that students can integrate advanced Islamic educational knowledge, research competence, pedagogical judgement, digital capability, and pesantren-based ethical responsibility. Conventional written examinations are insufficient when they are used as the dominant source of evidence because they tend to measure recall more strongly than transfer, professional reasoning, and scholarly performance. Using qualitative descriptive library research, this study synthesizes constructive alignment, outcome-based education, authentic assessment, rubric design, and quality assurance literature. The analysis produces a five-part model: mapping course outcomes to observable performances, selecting socially and professionally meaningful tasks, applying analytic rubrics, embedding feedback and revision, and conducting lecturer moderation. Suitable tasks include policy briefs, curriculum audits, research-informed lesson designs, critical reviews, community education projects, and oral defenses. The model positions assessment as a coherent system for generating valid evidence of graduate competence rather than merely assigning grades. Its novelty lies in connecting authentic assessment with the epistemic, pedagogical, research, and ethical profile of graduate Islamic religious education in a pesantren-based university context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ashford-Rowe, K., Herrington, J., & Brown, C. (2014). Establishing the critical elements that determine authentic assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(2), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.819566

Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871

Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462

Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504676

McArthur, J. (2023). Rethinking authentic assessment: Work, well-being, and society. Higher Education, 85, 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00822-y

Republic of Indonesia, Ministry of Higher Education, Science, and Technology. (2025). Regulation of the Minister of Higher Education, Science, and Technology Number 39 of 2025 concerning Quality Assurance in Higher Education.

Villarroel, V., Bloxham, S., Bruna, D., Bruna, C., & Herrera-Seda, C. (2018). Authentic assessment: Creating a blueprint for course design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 840–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1412396

Vlachopoulos, D., & Makri, A. (2024). A systematic literature review on authentic assessment in higher education: Best practices for the development of 21st century skills, and policy considerations. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 83, 101425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101425

Vu, T. T., & Dall’Alba, G. (2014). Authentic assessment for student learning: An ontological conceptualisation. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46(7), 778–791. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2013.795110

Wiggins, G. (1990). The case for authentic assessment. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.7275/ffb1-mm19

Zhan, Y., Boud, D., & Du, Z. (2025). Designing for authentic assessment: A scoping review. Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-025-01588-9.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-11

How to Cite

OUTCOME-BASED AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT FOR GRADUATE ISLAMIC RELIGIOUS EDUCATION AT UNZAH. (2026). AL-MANSHUBAT: Journal of Integrated Islamic Scholarship, 1(2), 280 – 284. https://journal.takamulilmu.com/index.php/almanshubat/article/view/87